Silencing Truth: How Indian Creek School’s Defamation Suit and Judicial Overreach Threaten Free Speech in America

On July 29, 2025, the Anne Arundel Circuit Court entered an Order granting summary judgment against Eric and Evan Hemphill in the Indian Creek School defamation case.

The order not only awarded judgment to ICS, but also issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the Hemphills from speaking out—a move that cuts directly against the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech.

A Court Against the Constitution

The ruling is extraordinary for what it does not do:

It does not resolve disputed facts—instead, it cuts off discovery and silences the defendants.
It does not weigh truth versus falsehood—instead, it assumes liability without a trial.
It does not protect the public’s interest in transparency around schools and child safety— instead, it shields an institution from criticism.

This is not just judicial error. It’s judicial overreach.

By issuing a permanent injunction against speech, the court has effectively criminalized public discussion of misconduct allegations at Indian Creek School. The result? Whistleblowers are gagged, and institutions are free to retaliate.

Why This Matters: The First Amendment Under Siege

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees:

Freedom of speech
Freedom of the press
The right to petition the government for redress of grievances

When a state court prevents citizens from speaking on matters of public concern—retaliation, child safety, institutional misconduct—it strikes at the heart of democratic freedoms.

What happened to the Hemphills is a warning to all Americans:

If a private school and a local court can silence whistleblowers through litigation, any citizen can be stripped of their right to speak truth to power.

Retaliation Disguised as Justice

This defamation suit was never about truth. It was always about retaliation.

Eric Hemphill was terminated after raising concerns.
Evan Hemphill was expelled.
Both father and son were branded as enemies for exposing misconduct.
Now, through the courts, ICS has turned its institutional power into a weapon.

The permanent injunction is not a protection of reputation—it’s a shield for corruption.

America at a Crossroads

This case echoes a larger constitutional crisis unfolding across America. Free speech is under attack—not only by governments, but by powerful institutions using the courts to bury truth.

We are witnessing:

Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP suits) used to silence critics
Judges granting gag orders without trials
Institutions weaponizing defamation law to intimidate whistleblowers

The Hemphills’ case is one of the most vivid examples of this abuse—and it will not be the last if it goes unchallenged.

The Fight Ahead

The Hemphills are not just fighting for themselves. They are fighting for:

Every whistleblower punished for telling the truth
Every parent who deserves transparency about schools
Every citizen whose right to speak freely is being eroded

This order cannot stand unchallenged. The fight is moving to higher courts, where the Constitution—not institutional convenience—must prevail.

Free speech is not defamation. Truth is not defamation. Retaliation is not justice.

Call to Action

Every American who values the First Amendment should be alarmed. This case isn’t about one family—it’s about the survival of constitutional freedoms in the face of institutional abuse.

Silence is complicity. Speaking out is the only defense.

Surviving Indian Creek School BlogTruth | Constitutional Rights | Justice

Indian

Creek

School